View credits, reviews, tracks and shop for the 2008 Gatefold, 180 gram Vinyl release of The Cosmos Rocks on Discogs. Label: Parlophone - 50999 2 37025 1 6. Format: 2x, Vinyl LP, Album Gatefold, 180 gram. Country: Europe. Genre: Rock, Pop. Style: Blues Rock, Hard Rock, Pop Rock, Glam. Here, Rodgers effectively rules the roost, helping steer The Cosmos Rocks far, far away from the meticulous, grandiose sonic sculptures of Queen at the height of their reign and toward a humble boogie. At its best, this can sound a bit like a second-rate Bad Company, at its worst it feels like Free - not quite like Queen, but not necessarily. Artist: Exogenesis Album: Hymn to the Cosmos Country: United States Genre: Atmospheric Black Metal Quality: Mp3, CBR 320 kbps Tracklist: CD 01: 01. The Cosmos Rocks QUEEN. The following product(s) are not available in your currency Format. MP3: 320 Kbps 134.46 MB Genre Rock Label Universal Music. Artist: Chris Bell Title: I Am the Cosmos Year Of Release: 19 Label: Rhino Genre: Folk Rock, Power Pop, Singer-Songwriter Quality: Mp3 320 / Flac (tracks) Total Time: 44:17 + 56:06 Total Size: 276/727 Mb (scans) WebSite: Album Preview.
WikiProject Queen (Inactive) | ||
---|---|---|
|
WikiProject Albums | (Rated Start-class) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lack of consistency[edit]
The first line of the article says 'Queen + Paul Rodgers album titled, 'The Cosmos Rocks', but the article name implies that there is no title. Should we move the article back to 'The Cosmos Rocks' or edit the first line? I think as per wikipedia rules the article can be titled the cosmos rocks as many internet sources (including the BBC) are saying that The Cosmos Rocks is, in fact, its title. [1]AceKingQueenJack (talk) 14:27, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Title[edit]
The album title has yet to be announced. Cosmos Rocks is the name of the tour. Why is it being applied to the album? 12:20, 2 April 2008 (UTC)BBC Has said that that will be the name of the album, and yes it has been announced.http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7306006.stmAceKingQueenJack (talk) 14:27, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Requested move[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
![Rocks Rocks](https://covers.mp3million.com/0134412/200/Queen %26 Paul Rodgers - Runaway (The Cosmos Rocks Bonus Track).jpg)
The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR (talk) 01:52, 12 April 2008 (UTC) https://coolaload676.weebly.com/arkham-knight-in-the-line-of-duty.html.
The Cosmos Rocks → Untitled 2008 Queen album — Queen's official website states the album is untitled.[2] —72.9.20.251 (talk) 00:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
It DOES appear to be the working title and the one most likely to be recognised by readers. And we would need to rename it AGAIN when the final name is published. So I'd be (mildly) against renaming at THIS point. Martin Packer (talk) 08:52, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Survey[edit]
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*''Support''
or*''Oppose''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
Discussion[edit]
- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Cosmos Rocks[edit]
Is it confirmed that there will be a song by the name of 'The Cosmos Rocks'? 85.243.128.112 (talk) 22:31, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- It's actually called 'Cosmos Rockin'.Sposato (talk) 17:10, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Confirmed tracks[edit]
There's a bit of a discrepancy with the confirmed tracks. Only the following have been officially confirmed by anyone: 'Say It's Not True', 'C-lebrity', 'We Believe', 'Call Me', and 'Whole House Rocking'. Del Shannon's 'Runaway' is the cover version that was going to be on the album, but isn't anymore.
'The Cosmos Rocks' is most likely part of 'Whole House Rocking'. I don't see anywhere on Brian's website where he hints at '46664 The Call' being on the new album, apart from a vague reply to a fan letter ('Well, this is certainly worth thinking about .maybe you will start a landslide !'). To me, that doesn't say anything about the song being on the new album, except that he might think about it. He may also just be saying that to placate the fan -- who knows. But it's unconfirmed all the same. https://coolkup273.weebly.com/minecraft-heaven-and-hell-mod.html. 'Warboys (A Prayer For Peace)' and 'Take Love' have also been hinted at being on the new album, mostly by Paul, but they are still unconfirmed. One of the more recent interviews with Paul said that 'Take Love' hadn't been recorded yet, and that 'Warboys' was offered to Q+PR but wasn't recorded yet either. And I have no idea where 'Hopefully' came from.
I'm not saying that these songs won't end up on the album, but until otherwise reported and confirmed, the aforementioned five tracks should be placed under an 'Unconfirmed / Rumored / Wishful thinking' category so as not to confuse fans. Or, at the very least, someone should cite their sources and confirm them. 68.37.95.196 (talk) 14:50, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
The Cosmos Rocks 320 Review
Authorship[edit]
I think we're very light on citations for authorship. And in some cases authorship might be disputed. Cosmos Rockin' is a case in point - as I've not hear the 'they all did it' :-) claim before. Martin Packer (talk) 20:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed . the only 'confirmed' authorships are: 'Cosmos Rockin' (Roger; mentioned in a radio interview), 'Warboys' (Paul), 'Call Me' (Paul), 'We Believe' (Brian), 'Say It's Not True' (Roger), and 'C-lebrity' (Roger). Everything else is unconfirmed, and shouldn't be passed off as truth when there's nothing substantial to back it up. 71.224.53.203 (talk) 02:51, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Song Information & 17th Studio Album[edit]
I vote we get rid of the song information stuff until there's more information. Intel atom d410 motherboard drivers for mac. There's just not enough to go by, in terms of who played what; it relies more on speculation and irrelevant opinion (for instance, under 'Some Things That Glitter': 'This is a love song written by Paul Rodgers. It features him on piano, and is very similar to the Bad Company song Silver, Blue and Gold, also penned by Rodgers, from their album Run with the Pack.' So what?).
Saw 4 hindi dubbed movie download. Also, what's the point in having the '17th Studio Album' section? The band haven't even finished the tour yet and there's already speculation for a new album? Ted williams shotgun serial numbers. What does that have anything to do with the album? Unless anyone has any objections, I'm going to delete this. 71.224.53.203 (talk) 01:18, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Sales figures[edit]
The Cosmos Rocks 320 Review
I've just fixed the broken sales figures table and while I was there I thought I'd double check the Silver/50,000 status for UK sales with the BPI [3] as there was no source cited. According to them, there is no data available for this album yet so I've removed the figure until it can be verified. Endnote dictionary converter. 10:01, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Edit summary[edit]
I'm sorry, I pressed enter before I finished typing my edit summary. It's still Queen + Paul Rogers Zazaban (talk) 01:58, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Track Listing[edit]
Two things: First is the enormous blank space above it.I have no clue how to fix that, could somebody do it?
And second:The format is completely different from every other album track listing.not that it's that bad in itself, but it is not consistent, and provides less information than desired - something similar to this is normally seen for smaller albums, which this album isn't.Zayniac (talk) 21:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
And second:The format is completely different from every other album track listing.not that it's that bad in itself, but it is not consistent, and provides less information than desired - something similar to this is normally seen for smaller albums, which this album isn't.Zayniac (talk) 21:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Reviews/reception[edit]
Who keeps changing the reviews?
'Largely negative' is supposed to be 'mixed.'--Greg D. Barnes (talk) 20:02, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- It has received largely negative reviews, it is one of the worst reviewed albums of all time. Largely negative does not mean exclusively negative. Matt lobster (talk) 12:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Calling it one of the worst reviewed albums of all time smacks of WP:OR and particularly WP:SYNTH to me. While I may or may not agree I think it's safest to leave it as 'mixed' from a verifiability point of view. 12:50, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- I agree that calling it on of the worst reviews albums of all the time would violate WP:OR and WP:SYNTH - mixed to me makes it sound like it's had average reviews. My argument was to say it had 'largely negative' reviews - a phrase that is used in numerous comparable WP entries. Matt lobster (talk) 21:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Pains me to say that the negative/mixed war is starting again although this time from a couple of anon IP accounts rather than actual user accounts. While it's fair to say that the album received its fair share of strongly negative reviews it also received a roughly equal number of strongly positive reviews as well as a healthy batch of ambivolent ones. On average I really think you have to stick with mixed rather than largely negative because it's simply not true. I'm getting tired of reverting these edits so if it continues then I'll ask an admin to put a temporary protect on the page so that anon accounts can't edit it. Hopefully that will encourage the editors to come to the talk page and discuss the issue properly. 21:37, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- While I'm more than happy to leave it at 'mixed' (It's not worth changing), your assertion that this album has had just as many positive reviews is rediculous or Original Research. Metacritic(which collates reviews) ranks it as one of the worst reviewed albums ever. Not mixed. One of the worst ever. 86.162.38.254 (talk) 17:41, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well that's very generous of you, thank you. And thanks also for 'rediculing' me. However if you actually bother to read metacritic [4] it quite clearly gives it a critics' score of 42 which equates to Mixed or average reviews. And it gets better as the user score is 6.8 out of 10!Perhaps you could check your facts before insulting people in the future? 21:39, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
- Image:MetaCriticCosmosRocksReview.JPG
- I'll get my coat. 86.129.215.18 (talk) 15:02, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- While I'm more than happy to leave it at 'mixed' (It's not worth changing), your assertion that this album has had just as many positive reviews is rediculous or Original Research. Metacritic(which collates reviews) ranks it as one of the worst reviewed albums ever. Not mixed. One of the worst ever. 86.162.38.254 (talk) 17:41, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
- Pains me to say that the negative/mixed war is starting again although this time from a couple of anon IP accounts rather than actual user accounts. While it's fair to say that the album received its fair share of strongly negative reviews it also received a roughly equal number of strongly positive reviews as well as a healthy batch of ambivolent ones. On average I really think you have to stick with mixed rather than largely negative because it's simply not true. I'm getting tired of reverting these edits so if it continues then I'll ask an admin to put a temporary protect on the page so that anon accounts can't edit it. Hopefully that will encourage the editors to come to the talk page and discuss the issue properly. 21:37, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that calling it on of the worst reviews albums of all the time would violate WP:OR and WP:SYNTH - mixed to me makes it sound like it's had average reviews. My argument was to say it had 'largely negative' reviews - a phrase that is used in numerous comparable WP entries. Matt lobster (talk) 21:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Calling it one of the worst reviewed albums of all time smacks of WP:OR and particularly WP:SYNTH to me. While I may or may not agree I think it's safest to leave it as 'mixed' from a verifiability point of view. 12:50, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Cosmos_Rocks&oldid=298070836'
The Cosmos Rocks 320 Full
Page Links: | Other Torrents - Comments |
File Name: | Decoherence - Unitarity (2020) |
Download Torrent: | Decoherence - Unitarity (2020) |
Description: | We’re honored to work again with DECOHERENCE as they open another remarkable chapter in their still short-lived history and continue their enigmatic and triumphant march into complete black metal defiance and transformation. Their immense sophomore LP “Unitarity” is scheduled for an August 14 2020 release and shows yet another marked evolution in their artistic trajectory, unveiling a higher order of craftsmanship while also venturing deeper into even more abstract and transformative realms of sonic annihilation. “Unitarity” can now be preordered from our shop and Bandcamp where the track “Remnants” is streamable. The album will be released in digital format as well as on a limited clear red vinyl edition limited to 100 copies, on standard black vinyl, and on cassette tape. 'Unitarity' sees Decoherence once again exploring through sound realms of the incomprehensible that lie far beyond human existence and understanding, in remote and alien corners of the cosmos were unimaginable cataclysms, and creation/destruction events of harrowing apocalyptic proportions dominate an immense lifeless void where light is cyclically and eternally torn and devoured. Figuratively placed at the center of this alien and incomprehensible plane of existence lies the music of Decoherence, an hallucinogenic architectural distortion of shapeshifting dark matter in which cold industrial tapestries, surreal and alien atmospheres and walls of mangled guitars and oppressive electronics design the erratic and twisting trajectories of the universe's most hidden and ungraspable abominations. Decoherence formed around 2018 by the will of unknown UK solo musician Stroda who writes, records and mixes all the band’s music, and who’d also made a name for himself in the undeground around then for posting online tens of enigmatic but highly crafted self-released instrumental demos under his own alias before joining forces with US-based vocalist Tahazu and creating the self-titled Decoherence debut 7”, released in 2019 by Sentient Ruin to overwhelmingly positive reviews. The duo then added Prior to fold, a third member handling noise and electronics for the band, an addition which vastly enhanced their sound and sonically pushed the band into a more unpredictable and dismal direction. The result was the immense debut LP “Ekpyrosis”, released the same year to even more overwhelmingly positive feedback. Now, the time has come for “Unitarity', Decoherence’s most towering, annihilating and immense album yet… SENTIENT RUIN LABORATORIES Multinational industrial atmospheric black metal entity Decoherence return with their mind-altering sophomore LP 'Unitarity', once again exploring through sound realms of the incomprehensible that lie far beyond human existence and understanding, in remote and alien corners of the cosmos were unimaginable cataclysms, and creation/destruction events of harrowing apocalyptic proportions dominate an immense lifeless void where light is cyclically and eternally torn and devoured. Figuratively placed at the center of this alien and incomprehensible plane of existence lies the music of Decoherence, an hallucinogenic architectural distortion of shapeshifting dark matter in which cold industrial tapestries, surreal and alien atmospheres and walls of mangled guitars and oppressive electronics design the erratic and twisting trajectories of the universe's most hidden and ungraspable abominations. SRUIN 115(Review of the original album 2018) Band Members Tahazu: vocals Stroda: all instruments Prior: noise and electronics Track List 1. Final Boundary State 05:59 2. Equilibrium Unreached 06:04 3. Metastable Phase Transition 09:35 4. Torsion Formed 07:54 5. Remnants 08:14 6. Unitarity Violation 06:45 44:31 industrial atmospheric black metal UK ?? Release Date: Aug 14 2020 Label: Sentient Ruin Laboratories 320 Kbs 106 MB MB |
Genre: | Black |
Subgenre: | industrial atmospheric black metal ?Ӻ |
Bitrate: | 320 k |
Size: | 102.78 MB |
Show/Hide Files: | |
Added: | 12/08/2020 |
Peer(s): | Seed(s): 16, Leecher(s): 0 = 16 Peer(s) |
Last Seed Update | 08/09/2020 13:17:31 |